Selling a House With Deed Restrictions: Lender Rules

What a deed restriction actually is

A deed restriction, also called a restrictive covenant, is a private rule recorded against your land. Someone before you, usually a developer platting a subdivision or a seller who wanted control over how land got used, wrote a limit into the chain of title. It then "runs with the land," meaning it binds you and every owner after you, not just the person who signed it. That is the key difference from a contract: you never agreed to it, but you inherited it when you took title.

Common examples include minimum dwelling size, architectural controls (roof type, fence height, no outbuildings), setback lines stricter than zoning, a ban on commercial use, a no-rental or no-short-term-rental clause, a single-family-only limit, or an age restriction tied to a 55-and-over community. Some are decades old and describe a world that no longer exists. Others are live and enforceable by a neighbor or an association.

Here is the honest headline before you read another word: the existence of a covenant on your title report is normal. Tens of millions of US homes carry them. What determines whether yours is a problem is not that it exists, but what it restricts, whether anyone can enforce it, and whether it collides with what your specific buyer wants to do or how they plan to pay.

Deed restriction vs HOA rule vs zoning

These three get blended together constantly, and the distinction decides how hard each one is to deal with. A zoning rule is public law set by your city or county, and you can sometimes get a variance or sell a property with a grandfathered legal nonconforming use. An HOA rule lives in the association's bylaws and can usually be amended by a member vote. A deed restriction is private and permanent unless released by the party who benefits from it, which can be far harder to change than either of the other two.

One source of confusion: an HOA's governing documents (the CC&Rs, short for covenants, conditions, and restrictions) are themselves recorded covenants. So an association can enforce both the shared rulebook and standalone deed restrictions. If your property sits in an association, understand how its dues and reserves work too, because that is a separate buyer concern covered in our guide to what HOA fees pay for.

How to find what runs with your land

You cannot disclose or price a restriction you have not read. Three documents tell you what binds your property.

Ask the title company for the underlying document, not just the one-line exception. A line that reads "subject to restrictions recorded in Book 412, Page 88" tells you nothing about whether the restriction forfeits title or merely bans vinyl siding. The full text is what your attorney and the buyer's lender will actually read. If you want to understand what that title policy protects against, our explainer on what title insurance covers walks through the exceptions in plain language.

A covenant on your title is not a reason to delist

An agent who has closed homes with recorded restrictions knows which ones scare buyers and which ones never come up. We match you with local listing agents ranked on real sales data.

Find a top local agent

What you have to disclose

Most states require sellers to disclose known material facts that affect value or use, and a recorded restriction that limits what a buyer can do with the property usually qualifies. The safer and simpler rule: if you know about a covenant that could matter to a buyer, disclose it in writing and attach the recorded document. Disclosure requirements vary widely by state, which is why we keep a running breakdown of what sellers must disclose by state.

There is almost never an upside to hiding a restriction. It is recorded in public land records, the buyer's title company will find it, and concealing a known material limit invites a post-closing lawsuit. Disclose early, before you are under contract, so a buyer with incompatible plans self-selects out before you waste a month in escrow.

• You bought the home as a rental and there is a no-lease clause. If you have been violating it, that history is material and a buyer taking over the lease needs to know.
• An addition, fence, or shop may violate a setback or architectural covenant. An unpermitted or non-conforming structure is its own disclosure problem; pair this with our guide to boundary and encroachment issues.
• The restriction names an active enforcer. A covenant still policed by a neighbor or committee is very different from an orphaned one with no party left to enforce it. Disclose who can enforce, if you know.

How the buyer's lender reacts

This is where sellers overworry. For a conventional loan, the buyer's lender follows Fannie Mae's rulebook, and Fannie Mae treats ordinary covenants as minor. According to the Fannie Mae Selling Guide section B7-2-05, title is acceptable even when subject to restrictive covenants and conditions, including minimum dwelling size or setback restrictions, as long as their violation will not result in a forfeiture or reversion of title, a lien for damages, or an adverse effect on fair market value. The same guide says minor title impediments must not materially affect the property's marketability.

Read the Fannie Mae language carefully, because it tells you exactly what to look for in your own covenant. The dangerous words are forfeiture and reversion of title. A plain rule ("no fence over six feet") is fine. A rule that says title automatically reverts to the developer's heirs if you ever build a fence over six feet is a live financing problem, because the lender's collateral could evaporate. Those forfeiture and reversion clauses are rare in modern subdivisions, but they turn up in old rural conveyances, church-land sales, and charitable transfers.

The appraiser is the other party watching. Appraisers are asked to note restrictions that affect value or use. A standard architectural covenant will not move the number. A restriction that blocks the property's highest and best use, say, a single-family-only limit on a lot that would otherwise be a teardown-and-build site, can show up in the valuation.

Rental bans, age limits, and the buyer pool

Two categories of covenant cause real deals to fall apart, and neither is about forfeiture. The first is a no-rental or no-short-term-rental clause. For an owner-occupant buyer, it is irrelevant. For an investor, it is fatal: if the buyer planned to rent the home and finance it as a rental, the covenant may make the property ineligible for their loan program, since the lender is underwriting projected rent that the covenant prohibits. An investor using a rental-focused product like a DSCR loan needs the rental income to qualify, and a ban removes it. If your likely buyer is an investor or an Airbnb operator, a no-rental covenant will shrink your pool to owner-occupants only.

The second is an age restriction. A 55-and-over covenant is legal under the federal housing-for-older-persons exemption, but it caps your buyer pool to qualifying households. That is not a financing defect; it is a market-size issue, and it is baked into how 55-plus communities resell. Price and market to the right buyer rather than fighting the restriction.

Old racial covenants: offensive but unenforceable

If your title search surfaces a racial or religious restriction, it is repugnant but legally dead. The American Land Title Association explains that two decades after the Supreme Court's 1948 Shelley v. Kraemer decision found racially restrictive covenants unenforceable, the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 made discriminatory covenants illegal and unenforceable. These clauses have no legal effect on your sale and cannot stop a buyer of any background from closing.

They do still sit in the record, though, and many owners want them struck. A majority of states now offer a cheap administrative process to disavow or remove the language. In Illinois, for example, a law lets owners and associations remove the offensive language through the recorder for a small fee and short turnaround (the statute set that fee at no more than $10). Procedures differ by state, so check your county recorder or state statute. Removing the language is about dignity and clean records; it is not a prerequisite for closing, because the covenant was never enforceable to begin with.

Modifying or releasing a live covenant: process and cost

Now the covenants that are enforceable. Releasing or amending one is harder than people expect, because the restriction often benefits many other parcels, and each benefited owner may have standing to enforce it. Your options, roughly from cheapest to most expensive:

Because releasing a covenant can mean tracking down every owner it benefits, budget realistically. A simple release from a cooperative single party might cost a few hundred dollars in legal and recording fees. A contested quiet-title action runs into the thousands and can take a year. Whether that spend makes sense depends entirely on whether the restriction actually blocks your sale. Deciding between a lawyer and leaning on your agent? Our comparison of a real estate attorney versus a Realtor helps you figure out who you actually need.

Price the restriction before you spend to remove it

A strong listing agent can tell you whether a covenant is costing you buyers or costing you nothing, so you do not sink thousands into legal removal you did not need.

Compare agents near you

When not to panic-spend

Here is the counterpoint the removal services will not lead with: most recorded covenants are harmless in practice and never affect a sale. Architectural rules, minimum-size clauses, and single-family limits match what a normal buyer wants to do anyway. Many old covenants have no living enforcer, no forfeiture language, and no effect on value. Spending thousands to legally strike a covenant that bothers no buyer and no lender is money lit on fire.

Spend the money only when the restriction clears a real bar: it contains a forfeiture or reversion clause that spooks the lender, it blocks your specific buyer's intended use (rental, subdivision, home business), or it is actively being enforced in a way that reduces what buyers will pay. Short of that, disclose it, attach the document, market to the buyer it fits, and move on. A restriction that merely exists is a line on a title report, not a crisis.

Frequently asked questions

The bottom line

A recorded covenant on your title report is common and, in the large majority of cases, harmless to your sale. Read the actual language and run it through one test: can violating it forfeit title, create a lien, or block your buyer's intended use or financing? If the answer is no, disclose it, attach the document, and keep selling. If the answer is yes, usually a forfeiture clause, a no-rental ban facing an investor buyer, or an age limit, address that specific issue rather than paying to remove a restriction that would never have mattered. Spend your money where the covenant actually costs you a buyer, not on paperwork that bothers no one.